linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] scsi: dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Fix warning for sdm845 by adding reg-names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <CTMFNWKMSCJP.DBPZEW25594L@otso>
Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:19:09 +0200
From:   "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
To:     "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Abel Vesa" <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
        "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@...nel.org>,
        "Andy Gross" <agross@...nel.org>,
        "Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
        "Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "Avri Altman" <avri.altman@....com>,
        "Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@....org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] scsi: dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Fix warning for
 sdm845 by adding reg-names

On Mon Jun 26, 2023 at 9:41 AM CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/06/2023 08:38, Luca Weiss wrote:
> >>>> but I guess no resends and it can be superseded.
> >>>
> >>> Right, the patches got reviews but was never applied... I really need to
> >>> find a strategy to keep track of sent patches until they're applied with
> >>> my work mailbox, it's not the first time that a patch has gotten
> >>> forgotten.
> >>
> >> There was an error reported on the above series. Why would it be 
> >> applied?
> > 
> > The error report at [0] complains about reg-names but I'm quite sure
> > that patch 2/3 resolves this error. Does your bot only apply one patch
> > at a time and run the check or apply all of them and then run it? It's
> > been a while but I'm fairly sure I ran all of the checks before sending
> > since I also documented some other patches in the cover letter there.
>
> You did it in cover letter, not in the patch, so there is no dependency
> for bots recorded.

I'm not aware how to put extra comments into a patch in a series with
b4, at least last time I checked I don't think it was possible? But I
also thought the cover letter was exactly there for giving some
background of the series and documenting any dependencies on other
patches.

>
> > 
> > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/167241769341.1925758.17856681634949446114.robh@kernel.org/
>
> Your patch 2/3 could not be applied to any tree. 3/3 applied but without
> previous one caused warnings.

Anyways, just resent the series as v4, maybe this time it can get picked
up... Should have enough reviews by now :)

Regards
Luca

>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof