[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJlwG4zzmm4ArMNX@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 14:01:47 +0300
From: "andy@...nel.org" <andy@...nel.org>
To: YE Chengfeng <cyeaa@...nect.ust.hk>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: cdev: Fix &lr->wait.lock deadlock issue
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:39:56AM +0000, YE Chengfeng wrote:
> linereq_put_event is called from both interrupt context (e.g.,
> edge_irq_thread) and process context (process_hw_ts_thread).
> Therefore, interrupt should be disabled before acquiring lock
> &lr->wait.lock inside linereq_put_event to avoid deadlock when
> the lock is held in process context and edge_irq_thread comes.
>
> Similarly, linereq_read_unlocked running in process context
> also acquies the same lock. It also need to disable interrupt
> otherwise deadlock could happen if the irq edge_irq_thread
> comes to execution while the lock is held.
>
> Fix the two potential deadlock issues by spin_lock_bh() and
> spin_lock_irq() separately.
Side note: You have two patches in something that seems to be the series,
but lacks the references in email headers. Whenever you send a series,
do not forget to add --thread to `git send-email`.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists