| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ed5f982e-c12c-b3a2-1108-62fba50bf9db@leemhuis.info>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 14:09:57 +0200
From: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
<regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Nick Hastings <nicholaschastings@...il.com>,
Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>,
"1036530@...s.debian.org" <1036530@...s.debian.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@....com>
Subject: Re: Regression from "ACPI: OSI: Remove Linux-Dell-Video _OSI string"?
(was: Re: Bug#1036530: linux-signed-amd64: Hard lock up of system)
Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting
for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
Nick, what's the status/was there any progress? Did you do what Mario
suggested and file a nouveau bug?
I ask, as I still have this on my list of regressions and it seems there
was no progress in three+ weeks now.
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
#regzbot backburner: slow progress, likely just affects one machine
#regzbot poke
On 02.06.23 02:57, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nick Hastings <nicholaschastings@...il.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 7:02 PM
>> To: Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@....com>; Lyude Paul
>> <lyude@...hat.com>; Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>; Salvatore
>> Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>; 1036530@...s.debian.org; Rafael J.
>> Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>; Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>; linux-
>> acpi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>> regressions@...ts.linux.dev
>> Subject: Re: Regression from "ACPI: OSI: Remove Linux-Dell-Video _OSI
>> string"? (was: Re: Bug#1036530: linux-signed-amd64: Hard lock up of system)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> * Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com> [230602 03:10]:
>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 7:21 PM Limonciello, Mario
>>> <Mario.Limonciello@....com> wrote:
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 12:19 PM
>>>>> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@....com>
>>>>> Cc: Nick Hastings <nicholaschastings@...il.com>; Lyude Paul
>>>>> <lyude@...hat.com>; Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>; Salvatore
>>>>> Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>; 1036530@...s.debian.org; Rafael J.
>>>>> Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>; Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>; linux-
>>>>> acpi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>>>>> regressions@...ts.linux.dev
>>>>> Subject: Re: Regression from "ACPI: OSI: Remove Linux-Dell-Video _OSI
>>>>> string"? (was: Re: Bug#1036530: linux-signed-amd64: Hard lock up of
>> system)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 6:54 PM Limonciello, Mario
>>>>> <Mario.Limonciello@....com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2023 11:33 AM
>>>>>>> To: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@....com>
>>>>>>> Cc: Nick Hastings <nicholaschastings@...il.com>; Lyude Paul
>>>>>>> <lyude@...hat.com>; Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>; Salvatore
>>>>>>> Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>; 1036530@...s.debian.org; Rafael
>> J.
>>>>>>> Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>; Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>; linux-
>>>>>>> acpi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>>>>>>> regressions@...ts.linux.dev
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Regression from "ACPI: OSI: Remove Linux-Dell-Video
>> _OSI
>>>>>>> string"? (was: Re: Bug#1036530: linux-signed-amd64: Hard lock up of
>>>>> system)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 6:18 PM Limonciello, Mario
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lyude, Lukas, Karol
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This thread is in relation to this commit:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 24867516f06d ("ACPI: OSI: Remove Linux-Dell-Video _OSI string")
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nick has found that runtime PM is *not* working for nouveau.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> keep in mind we have a list of PCIe controllers where we apply a
>>>>>>> workaround:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers
>>>>>>> /gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c?h=v6.4-rc4#n682
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And I suspect there might be one or two more IDs we'll have to add
>>>>>>> there. Do we have any logs?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's some archived onto the distro bug. Search this page for
>>>>> "journalctl.log.gz"
>>>>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036530
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> interesting.. It seems to be the same controller used here. I wonder
>>>>> if the pci topology is different or if the workaround is applied at
>>>>> all.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't see the message in the log about the workaround being applied
>>>> in that log, so I guess PCI topology difference is a likely suspect.
>>>>
>>>
>>> yeah, but I also couldn't see a log with the usual nouveau messages,
>>> so it's kinda weird.
>>>
>>> Anyway, the output of `lspci -tvnn` would help
>>
>> % lspci -tvnn
>> -[0000:00]-+-00.0 Intel Corporation Device [8086:3e20]
>> +-01.0-[01]----00.0 NVIDIA Corporation TU117M [GeForce GTX 1650
>> Mobile / Max-Q] [10de:1f91]
>
> So the bridge it's connected to is the same that the quirk *should have been* triggering.
>
> May 29 15:02:42 xps kernel: pci 0000:00:01.0: [8086:1901] type 01 class 0x060400
>
> Since the quirk isn't working and this is still a problem in 6.4-rc4 I suggest opening a
> Nouveau drm bug to figure out why.
>
>> +-02.0 Intel Corporation CoffeeLake-H GT2 [UHD Graphics 630]
>> [8086:3e9b]
>> +-04.0 Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500 v5/6th Gen Core
>> Processor Thermal Subsystem [8086:1903]
>> +-08.0 Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v5/v6 / E3-1500 v5 /
>> 6th/7th/8th Gen Core Processor Gaussian Mixture Model [8086:1911]
>> +-12.0 Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH Thermal Controller
>> [8086:a379]
>> +-14.0 Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH USB 3.1 xHCI Host Controller
>> [8086:a36d]
>> +-14.2 Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM [8086:a36f]
>> +-15.0 Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH Serial IO I2C Controller #0
>> [8086:a368]
>> +-15.1 Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH Serial IO I2C Controller #1
>> [8086:a369]
>> +-16.0 Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH HECI Controller [8086:a360]
>> +-17.0 Intel Corporation Cannon Lake Mobile PCH SATA AHCI Controller
>> [8086:a353]
>> +-1b.0-[02-3a]----00.0-[03-3a]--+-00.0-[04]----00.0 Intel Corporation
>> JHL6340 Thunderbolt 3 NHI (C step) [Alpine Ridge 2C 2016] [8086:15d9]
>> | +-01.0-[05-39]--
>> | \-02.0-[3a]----00.0 Intel Corporation JHL6340
>> Thunderbolt 3 USB 3.1 Controller (C step) [Alpine Ridge 2C 2016]
>> [8086:15db]
>> +-1c.0-[3b]----00.0 Intel Corporation Wi-Fi 6 AX200 [8086:2723]
>> +-1c.4-[3c]----00.0 Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTS525A PCI
>> Express Card Reader [10ec:525a]
>> +-1d.0-[3d]----00.0 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller
>> SM981/PM981/PM983 [144d:a808]
>> +-1f.0 Intel Corporation Cannon Lake LPC Controller [8086:a30e]
>> +-1f.3 Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH cAVS [8086:a348]
>> +-1f.4 Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH SMBus Controller
>> [8086:a323]
>> \-1f.5 Intel Corporation Cannon Lake PCH SPI Controller
>> [8086:a324]
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Nick.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists