lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEuDKivK69Fky3y9UqC3VCk=e1f98QmkxNqVZcW1-PF4tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2023 11:08:15 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
Cc:     "mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vdpa/vp_vdpa: Check queue number of vdpa device from add_config

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 11:02 AM Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 10:51 AM
> > To: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> > Cc: mst@...hat.com; virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vdpa/vp_vdpa: Check queue number of vdpa device from
> > add_config
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:42 AM Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,jason.
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > > > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 10:30 AM
> > > > To: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> > > > Cc: mst@...hat.com; virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org;
> > > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vdpa/vp_vdpa: Check queue number of vdpa device
> > from
> > > > add_config
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 5:02 PM Angus Chen
> > <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > When add virtio_pci vdpa device,check the vqs number of device cap
> > > > > and max_vq_pairs from add_config.
> > > > > Simply starting from failing if the provisioned #qp is not
> > > > > equal to the one that hardware has.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > v1: Use max_vqs from add_config
> > > > > v2: Just return fail if max_vqs from add_config is not same as device
> > > > >         cap. Suggested by jason.
> > > > >
> > > > >  drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > > > >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> > > > b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> > > > > index 281287fae89f..c1fb6963da12 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> > > > > @@ -480,32 +480,39 @@ static int vp_vdpa_dev_add(struct
> > > > vdpa_mgmt_dev *v_mdev, const char *name,
> > > > >         u64 device_features;
> > > > >         int ret, i;
> > > > >
> > > > > -       vp_vdpa = vdpa_alloc_device(struct vp_vdpa, vdpa,
> > > > > -                                   dev, &vp_vdpa_ops, 1, 1,
> > name,
> > > > false);
> > > > > -
> > > > > -       if (IS_ERR(vp_vdpa)) {
> > > > > -               dev_err(dev, "vp_vdpa: Failed to allocate vDPA
> > > > structure\n");
> > > > > -               return PTR_ERR(vp_vdpa);
> > > > > +       if (add_config->mask &
> > > > BIT_ULL(VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MAX_VQP)) {
> > > > > +               if (add_config->net.max_vq_pairs !=
> > > > (v_mdev->max_supported_vqs / 2)) {
> > > > > +                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "max vqs 0x%x should
> > be
> > > > equal to 0x%x which device has\n",
> > > > > +                               add_config->net.max_vq_pairs*2,
> > > > v_mdev->max_supported_vqs);
> > > > > +                       return -EINVAL;
> > > > > +               }
> > > > >         }
> > > > >
> > > > > -       vp_vdpa_mgtdev->vp_vdpa = vp_vdpa;
> > > > > -
> > > > > -       vp_vdpa->vdpa.dma_dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > > -       vp_vdpa->queues = vp_modern_get_num_queues(mdev);
> > > > > -       vp_vdpa->mdev = mdev;
> > > > > -
> > > > >         device_features = vp_modern_get_features(mdev);
> > > > >         if (add_config->mask & BIT_ULL(VDPA_ATTR_DEV_FEATURES))
> > {
> > > > >                 if (add_config->device_features & ~device_features) {
> > > > > -                       ret = -EINVAL;
> > > > >                         dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Try to provision
> > features
> > > > "
> > > > >                                 "that are not supported by the
> > device:
> > > > "
> > > > >                                 "device_features 0x%llx
> > provisioned
> > > > 0x%llx\n",
> > > > >                                 device_features,
> > > > add_config->device_features);
> > > > > -                       goto err;
> > > > > +                       return -EINVAL;
> > > > >                 }
> > > > >                 device_features = add_config->device_features;
> > > > >         }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       vp_vdpa = vdpa_alloc_device(struct vp_vdpa, vdpa,
> > > > > +                                   dev, &vp_vdpa_ops, 1, 1,
> > name,
> > > > false);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       if (IS_ERR(vp_vdpa)) {
> > > > > +               dev_err(dev, "vp_vdpa: Failed to allocate vDPA
> > > > structure\n");
> > > > > +               return PTR_ERR(vp_vdpa);
> > > > > +       }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       vp_vdpa_mgtdev->vp_vdpa = vp_vdpa;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       vp_vdpa->vdpa.dma_dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > > +       vp_vdpa->queues = v_mdev->max_supported_vqs;
> > > >
> > > > Why bother with those changes?
> > > >
> > > >         mgtdev->max_supported_vqs =
> > vp_modern_get_num_queues(mdev);
> > > max_supported_vqs will not be changed, so we can get max_supported_vqs
> > from mgtdev->max_supported_vqs.
> > > If we use vp_modern_get_num_queues(mdev),it will use tlp to communicate
> > with device.
> > > It just reduce some tlp .
> >
> > Ok, but
> >
> > 1) I think we don't care the performance here
> > 2) If we did, let's use a separate patch to do that as an optimization
> >
> Thank you.As mst did not support this patch some days ago,so this patch will be dropped.
> I plan to push a dependent driver of our product rather than reuse vp_vdpa.

That would be fine. But please try best to reuse modern virtio-pci library.

> By the way ,if I want to add sriov support in our vdpa pci driver,would it be accepted or not?

I think the answer is yes.

Thanks

> > Thanks
> >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > +       vp_vdpa->mdev = mdev;
> > > > >         vp_vdpa->device_features = device_features;
> > > > >
> > > > >         ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev,
> > vp_vdpa_free_irq_vectors,
> > > > pdev);
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > >
> > >
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ