[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230626145756.30696-2-dg573847474@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 14:57:56 +0000
From: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
To: linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl, andy@...nel.org
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cyeaa@...nect.ust.hk, Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpiolib: cdev: Fix &le->wait.lock deadlock issue
The softirq lineevent_irq_thread() could deadlock on &le->wait.lock
if it preempts lineevent_read_unlocked() which acquires the same
lock but not disable irq.
Fix the potential deadlock by spin_lock_irq().
Fixes: dea9c80ee672 ("gpiolib: rework the locking mechanism for lineevent kfifo")
Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@...il.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
index f768d46bdea7..a2c108f172f2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
@@ -1858,28 +1858,28 @@ static ssize_t lineevent_read_unlocked(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
return -EINVAL;
do {
- spin_lock(&le->wait.lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&le->wait.lock);
if (kfifo_is_empty(&le->events)) {
if (bytes_read) {
- spin_unlock(&le->wait.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&le->wait.lock);
return bytes_read;
}
if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
- spin_unlock(&le->wait.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&le->wait.lock);
return -EAGAIN;
}
- ret = wait_event_interruptible_locked(le->wait,
+ ret = wait_event_interruptible_locked_irq(le->wait,
!kfifo_is_empty(&le->events));
if (ret) {
- spin_unlock(&le->wait.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&le->wait.lock);
return ret;
}
}
ret = kfifo_out(&le->events, &ge, 1);
- spin_unlock(&le->wait.lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&le->wait.lock);
if (ret != 1) {
/*
* This should never happen - we were holding the lock
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists