[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKFNMomCU54JHKZxcUFLwci5ntzdD7gTv6JADhg--rLHXCcC+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 00:26:34 +0900
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 47/79] nilfs2: switch to new ctime accessors
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:48 PM Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> In later patches, we're going to change how the ctime.tv_nsec field is
> utilized. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of
> inode->i_ctime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> ---
> fs/nilfs2/dir.c | 6 +++---
> fs/nilfs2/inode.c | 12 ++++++------
> fs/nilfs2/ioctl.c | 2 +-
> fs/nilfs2/namei.c | 8 ++++----
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>
As already mentioned in the s390 patch comment, the implementation of
inode_ctime_set_current() needs to be rewritten to use
inode_ctime_set() instead of inode_set_ctime(), but I agree with this
conversion patch for nilfs2 itself.
Thank you for your efforts.
Ryusuke Konishi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists