[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <rg3qxgiqqi5ltt4jcf3k5tcnynh2so5ascvrte4gywcfffusv4@qjz3tkumeq7g>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 18:04:44 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...rdevices.ru, oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 06/17] vsock: check error queue to set EPOLLERR
On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 11:49:28PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>If socket's error queue is not empty, EPOLLERR must be set. Otherwise,
>reader of error queue won't detect data in it using EPOLLERR bit.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
This patch looks like it can go even without this series.
Is it a fix? Should we add a fixes tag?
Thanks,
Stefano
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index efb8a0937a13..45fd20c4ed50 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ static __poll_t vsock_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
> poll_wait(file, sk_sleep(sk), wait);
> mask = 0;
>
>- if (sk->sk_err)
>+ if (sk->sk_err || !skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_error_queue))
> /* Signify that there has been an error on this socket. */
> mask |= EPOLLERR;
>
>--
>2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists