[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJnFm0gD4K0uc92G@google.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 17:06:35 +0000
From: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] KVM: Documentation: Update the field name gfns in
kvm_mmu_page
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On 2023-06-18 at 00:08:52 +0000, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> > Update the 'gfns' in kvm_mmu_page to 'shadowed_translation'to be consistent
> > with the code. The more detailed description of 'shadowed_translation' is
> > already inlined in the data structure definition, so no need to duplicate
> > the text but simply just update the name.
>
> The definition of this field is changed, but apprently the description
> here is for gfns. It leaves some confusion if we just leave them
> unchanged.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
> > index 561efa8ec7d7..149dd3cba48f 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/x86/mmu.rst
> > @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ Shadow pages contain the following information:
> > at __pa(sp2->spt). sp2 will point back at sp1 through parent_pte.
> > The spt array forms a DAG structure with the shadow page as a node, and
> > guest pages as leaves.
> > - gfns:
> > + shadowed_translation:
> > An array of 512 guest frame numbers, one for each present pte. Used to
>
> guest frame numbers -> shadow translation info (gfn + access)
Will add this one. I will avoid the "(gfn + access)" since that is
already described in the comments inline and it may subject to changes,
eg., adding more bits in the future.
>
> > perform a reverse map from a pte to a gfn. When role.direct is set, any
>
> Just "perform reverse mapping" is OK?
I will tend to leave that as is, since it is not a major issue.
>
> > element of this array can be calculated from the gfn field when used, in
>
> May remove the "of gfns"
will do.
>
> Thanks,
> Yilun
Thanks for the comment, will update it in next version.
>
> > --
> > 2.41.0.162.gfafddb0af9-goog
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists