[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJpmybS4av40w87L@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 21:34:17 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] writeback: Factor writeback_get_folio() out of
write_cache_pages()
> + for (;;) {
> + folio = writeback_get_next(mapping, wbc);
> + if (!folio)
> + return NULL;
> + wbc->done_index = folio->index;
> +
> + folio_lock(folio);
> + if (likely(should_writeback_folio(mapping, wbc, folio)))
> + break;
> + folio_unlock(folio);
> + }
> +
> + trace_wbc_writepage(wbc, inode_to_bdi(mapping->host));
> + return folio;
Same minor nitpick, why not:
while ((folio = writeback_get_next(mapping, wbc)) {
wbc->done_index = folio->index;
folio_lock(folio);
if (likely(should_writeback_folio(mapping, wbc, folio))) {
trace_wbc_writepage(wbc, inode_to_bdi(mapping->host));
break;
}
folio_unlock(folio);
}
return folio;
?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists