linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230627103900.04fa564f@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:39:00 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:     Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the ext4 tree got a conflict in:

  fs/ext4/ioctl.c

between commit:

  97524b454bc5 ("ext4: split ext4_shutdown")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  c4d13222afd8 ("ext4: fix to check return value of freeze_bdev() in ext4_shutdown()")

from the ext4 tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/ext4/ioctl.c
index 961284cc9b65,55be1b8a6360..000000000000
--- a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
@@@ -793,10 -793,18 +793,11 @@@ static int ext4_ioctl_setproject(struc
  }
  #endif
  
 -static int ext4_shutdown(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long arg)
 +int ext4_force_shutdown(struct super_block *sb, u32 flags)
  {
  	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
 -	__u32 flags;
+ 	int ret;
  
 -	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
 -		return -EPERM;
 -
 -	if (get_user(flags, (__u32 __user *)arg))
 -		return -EFAULT;
 -
  	if (flags > EXT4_GOING_FLAGS_NOLOGFLUSH)
  		return -EINVAL;
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped