[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230627-feb5bf584a3fd16d2c0ffe66@orel>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:16:33 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
Cc: xiaobo55x@...il.com, maz@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
seanjc@...gle.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/12] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add finalize_vcpu check
in run_test
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 06:40:13PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Disable all vcpu extensions which were enabled by default
> if they were available in the risc-v host, and only enable
> the desired one for a vcpu_config.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> index 3beb6b62de0a..612dabc61137 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> @@ -138,11 +138,50 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm
> prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init);
> vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
> aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init);
> - finalize_vcpu(vcpu, c);
>
> return vcpu;
> }
> #else
> +static inline bool vcpu_has_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int ext)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + unsigned long value;
> +
> + ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(ext), &value);
> + if (ret) {
> + printf("Failed to get ext %d", ext);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return !!value;
> +}
> +
> +static void finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> +{
> + struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
> +
> + /*
> + * Disable all extensions which were enabled by default
> + * if they were available in the risc-v host.
> + */
> + for (int i = 0; i < KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX; i++) {
> + __vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(i), 0);
> + }
nit: can drop the {}
> +
> + for_each_sublist(c, s) {
> + if (!s->feature)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Try to enable the desired extension */
> + __vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(s->feature), 1);
> +
> + /* Double check whether the desired extension was enabled */
> + __TEST_REQUIRE(vcpu_has_ext(vcpu, s->feature),
> + "%s: %s not available, skipping tests\n",
> + config_name(c), s->name);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm)
> {
> return __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0);
> @@ -178,6 +217,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
>
> vm = vm_create_barebones();
> vcpu = vcpu_config_get_vcpu(c, vm);
> + finalize_vcpu(vcpu, c);
Now that both arm and riscv call finalize_vcpu() we could do the weak
function trick for it and move the arch-specific implementations to
their own arch-specific files.
>
> reg_list = vcpu_get_reg_list(vcpu);
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Thanks,
drew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists