[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230627110025.vgtplc6nluiiuvoh@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 13:00:25 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
Cc: miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, rafael@...nel.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, amitk@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
mmayer@...adcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
florian.fainelli@...adcom.com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
linux-imx@....com, agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, thara.gopinath@...il.com,
heiko@...ech.de, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, tglx@...utronix.de, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@...renesas.com, shangxiaojing@...wei.com,
bchihi@...libre.com, wenst@...omium.org,
hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, chi.minghao@....com.cn,
johan+linaro@...nel.org, jernej.skrabec@...il.com,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] genirq/devres: Add error information printing
for devm_request_threaded_irq()
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 06:12:01PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Ensure that all error handling branches print error information. In this
> way, when this function fails, the upper-layer functions can directly
> return an error code without missing debugging information. Otherwise,
> the error message will be printed redundantly or missing.
>
> There are more than 700 calls to the devm_request_threaded_irq method.
> Most drivers only request one interrupt resource, and these error
> messages are basically the same. If error messages are printed
> everywhere, more than 1000 lines of code can be saved by removing the
> msg in the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
> ---
> kernel/irq/devres.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/devres.c b/kernel/irq/devres.c
> index f6e5515ee077..fcb946ffb7ec 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/devres.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/devres.c
> @@ -58,8 +58,10 @@ int devm_request_threaded_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
>
> dr = devres_alloc(devm_irq_release, sizeof(struct irq_devres),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!dr)
> + if (!dr) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate device resource data\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> if (!devname)
> devname = dev_name(dev);
> @@ -67,6 +69,7 @@ int devm_request_threaded_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq,
> rc = request_threaded_irq(irq, handler, thread_fn, irqflags, devname,
> dev_id);
> if (rc) {
> + dev_err_probe(dev, rc, "Failed to request threaded irq%d: %d\n", irq, rc);
This changes semantics because dev_err_probe() is only supposed to be
called in probe functions. Not sure about devm_request_threaded_irq, but
its friend request_irq is called in the setup_irq (or open IIRC)
callback of serial drivers.
While I assume changing to dev_err_probe is a result of my concern that
no error should be printed when rc=-EPROBEDEFER, my other concern that
adding an error message to a generic allocation function is a bad idea
still stands.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists