linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] PM: domains: Allow devices attached to genpd to be managed by HW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZJrMg7EXzfVP0oBz@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2023 14:48:19 +0300
From:   Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        avel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@....qualcomm.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] PM: domains: Allow devices attached to genpd to
 be managed by HW

On 23-06-27 13:02:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:54:06PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > On 23-06-27 12:46:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Also, why is this a RFC series?  What is left to do with it to get it
> > > into a state which you feel comfortable having us review it "for real"?
> > 
> > There is a bit of back story here. This HW control support is something
> > that Qualcomm platforms support for some of the PDs. Sent this as RFC
> > as I thought it might open up a discussion of such a generic need at
> > first. But now that I think of it, it might've been a non-RFC patch as
> > well.
> 
> You need to provide that information, otherwise what are we supposed to
> do with this patch series?  What would you do if you got it in your
> inbox?

Will do in the next version.

Thanks.

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h