[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV924gJs1X1nMUbQ5LEbFe8hrrXgxxvgZ_dXf95O0bK5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 14:01:34 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Gurchetan Singh <gurchetansingh@...omium.org>,
Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Marek Olšák <maraeo@...il.com>,
Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@....com>,
Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@...labora.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] drm/virtio: Support sync objects
Hi Dmitry,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 6:11 PM Dmitry Osipenko
<dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com> wrote:
> On 6/25/23 18:36, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 2:41 PM Dmitry Osipenko
> > <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com> wrote:
> >> On 6/25/23 11:47, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 1:55 PM Dmitry Osipenko
> >>> <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com> wrote:
> >>>> Add sync object DRM UAPI support to VirtIO-GPU driver. Sync objects
> >>>> support is needed by native context VirtIO-GPU Mesa drivers, it also will
> >>>> be used by Venus and Virgl contexts.
> >>>>
> >>>> Reviewed-by; Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@...labora.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your patch!
> >>>
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_submit.c
> >>>
> >>>> +static int
> >>>> +virtio_gpu_parse_deps(struct virtio_gpu_submit *submit)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct drm_virtgpu_execbuffer *exbuf = submit->exbuf;
> >>>> + struct drm_virtgpu_execbuffer_syncobj syncobj_desc;
> >>>> + size_t syncobj_stride = exbuf->syncobj_stride;
> >>>> + u32 num_in_syncobjs = exbuf->num_in_syncobjs;
> >>>> + struct drm_syncobj **syncobjs;
> >>>> + int ret = 0, i;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if (!num_in_syncobjs)
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /*
> >>>> + * kvalloc at first tries to allocate memory using kmalloc and
> >>>> + * falls back to vmalloc only on failure. It also uses GFP_NOWARN
> >>>
> >>> GFP_NOWARN does not exist.
> >>
> >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc7/source/include/linux/gfp_types.h#L38
> >
> > That line defines "__GFP_NOWARN", not "GFP_NOWARN".
> > C is case- and underscore-sensitive. as is "git grep -w" ;-)
>
> The removal of underscores was done intentionally for improving
> readability of the comment
Please don't do that, as IMHO it actually hampers readability:
1. For some xxx, both GFP_xxx and __GFP_xxx are defined,
so it does matter which one you are referring to,
2. After dropping the underscores, "git grep -w" can no longer find
the definition, nor its users.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists