Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2023 16:10:06 +0200
From:   Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Wenbin Mei <wenbin.mei@...iatek.com>,
        Sam Shih <sam.shih@...iatek.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Aw: Re:  Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: mtk-sd: update
 assigned-clocks/clock-parents for mt7986

Hi


> Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juni 2023 um 15:37 Uhr
> Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> On 27/06/2023 14:09, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juni 2023 um 12:44 Uhr
> >> Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> >> Betreff: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: mtk-sd: update assigned-clocks/clock-parents for mt7986
> >>
> >> On 25/06/2023 21:11, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> >>> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
> >>>
> >>> MT7986 has 2 clock-parents so update the binding for it.
> >>
> >> You didn't test it, I think. If you do, then you will see errors from
> >> other trees.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > i tested it of course...which errors do you see?
>
> The top-level said it can be maximum 1, so raising it in allOf:if:then:
> should not be enough

but the previous error with too long list wasn't there after the change...so it seems to work...if it right, i don't know,
but other properties are overriddedn the same way.

> > 11
> > this is basicly how i tested it (in case anything has changed):
> >
> >         logfile=dtbs_arm64.log
> >         exec 3> >(tee $logfile)
> >         ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check 2>&3
> >         if [[ $? -ne 0 ]];then echo "arm64 binding check failed!";cat $logfile;exit 1;fi
> >         ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- make defconfig #dtbs_check need kernel-config
> >         ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- make -j8 DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dtbs_check 2>&3
> >         if [[ $? -ne 0 ]];then echo "arm64 dtbs_check failed!";cat $logfile;exit 1;fi
>
> A bit over-complicated... why not running dtbs_check against the schema
> you changed?

it is a script i only start ;) and having a logfile (with all messages - stdin+stdout) makes it easier to find something.
i had always the problem, that second run does not show the errors again without changing the yaml or dts.

as you see below i tried the run against the yaml too, but there are many many unrelated compatibles which seem to be not
documented or still in txt bindings.

> > and looked into the resulting logfile for keywords like mmc like mtk-sd
> >
> > i tried running dtbs_check with passing the yaml-file, but of course all compatibles not matching this file were reported.
> >
> > ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- make -j6 DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml
> >
> > but this spits out many errors "failed to match any schema with compatible" because i defined only the changed one...
> >
> > maybe there is another way to check only one yaml file against all dtbs without these unrelated errors.
> >
> > pipeline in dt-bindings-patchwork is clean too
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20230625191151.7808-2-linux@fw-web.de/
>
> Maybe that binding just fails to apply to DTS because of missing or not
> correct compatibles.

the messages are unrelated to current yaml file i passed with the DT_SCHEMA_FILES parameter, e.g. the last messages:

	From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dsi.yaml
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@...20000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-imgsys', 'syscon']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@...00000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-vdecsys', 'syscon']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@...00000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-vencsys', 'syscon']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@...00000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-ipu_conn', 'syscon']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@...10000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-ipu_adl', 'syscon']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@...80000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-ipu_core0', 'syscon']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@...80000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-ipu_core1', 'syscon']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@...00000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-camsys', 'syscon']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /mt8183-sound: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183_mt6358_ts3a227_max98357']
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb: bt-sco: '#sound-dai-cells' is a required property

> >> Anyway, I don't understand why defining it in the first place. Just drop
> >> the assigned-clock* from the binding.
> >
> > as it was defined (not looked where it was used) i only used the soc-specific branch to update the MaxItems...just to not break anything. After that the message i got before was fixed
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7986a-bananapi-bpi-r3.dtb: mmc@...30000: assigned-clocks: [[4, 35], [4, 34]] is too long
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7986a-bananapi-bpi-r3.dtb: mmc@...30000: assigned-clock-parents: [[5, 6], [4, 18]] is too long
> >
> > but if the right way is to drop the MaxItems from generic (or the property itself - where is it taken from then?). The only
> > include i see is Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml and there the assigned-clock* is not defined. And the
>
> The way is to entirely drop assigned-clocks. I don't think there are
> much benefits of having them in the bindings. Maybe if specific rates
> are required, then yes - device cannot work with other rates and you can
> verify it with dtbs_check. But otherwise it is like adding values of
> 'reg' or 'interrupts'. Plus some board might require third item and then
> what?

mhm, disabled all assigned-clock* properties and do not get any messages about this (don't know why because of "unevaluatedProperties: false", but looks like it works)

there are only some syscon-nodes in mt8173-*.dtb where these properties used are reported

btw. need binding also be backported to stable? so do i need to add the tag there?

regards Frank

Powered by blists - more mailing lists