linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2023 22:33:37 -0400
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 07:13:54PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> fs/bcachefs/alloc_background.c: In function ‘bch2_check_alloc_info’:
> fs/bcachefs/alloc_background.c:1526:1: warning: the frame size of 2640 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>  1526 | }
>       | ^
> fs/bcachefs/reflink.c: In function ‘bch2_remap_range’:
> fs/bcachefs/reflink.c:388:1: warning: the frame size of 2352 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>   388 | }
>       | ^

What version of gcc are you using? I'm not seeing either of those
warnings - I'm wondering if gcc recently got better about stack usage
when inlining.

also not seeing any reason why bch2_remap_range's stack frame should be
that big, to my eye it looks like it should be more like 1k, so if
anyone knows some magic for seeing stack frame layout that would be
handy...

anyways, there's a patch in my testing branch that should fix
bch2_check_alloc_info