linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: xiic: Don't try to handle more interrupt events after error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2023 16:13:02 +0000
From:   Robert Hancock <robert.hancock@...ian.com>
To:     "wsa@...nel.org" <wsa@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "shubhraj@...inx.com" <shubhraj@...inx.com>,
        "michal.simek@....com" <michal.simek@....com>,
        "marex@...x.de" <marex@...x.de>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "andi.shyti@...nel.org" <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: xiic: Don't try to handle more interrupt events
 after error

On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 23:25 +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 05:32:42PM +0200, wsa@...nel.org wrote:
> > 
> > > I think the patch is correct and I will ack it:
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
> > > 
> > > I think, though, that this needs a proper fix and testing, in
> > > order to cover all the possible combinations. The scenario you
> > > highlighted is indeed one, but not only, potential situation that
> > > could arise.
> > > 
> > > Can I just ask you to write a bit more in the comment to
> > > highlight the possible failure?
> > 
> > I tend to apply it to for-current because it improves the
> > situation.
> > Further improvements could be made incrementally? D'accord
> > everyone?
> > 
> 
> OK with that!
> 
> Thanks,
> Andi

Just checking on this patch, was it merged? It shows accepted in
Patchwork, but I'm not seeing it in the Git tree.

-- 
Robert Hancock <robert.hancock@...ian.com>