linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] Input: cap11xx - add advanced sensitivity settings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2023 12:06:14 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Valek - 2N <jiriv@...s.com>
Cc:     krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] Input: cap11xx - add advanced sensitivity settings

Hi Jiri,

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 08:53:16AM +0200, Jiri Valek - 2N wrote:
> @@ -439,7 +589,7 @@ static int cap11xx_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c_client)
>  	priv->idev->id.bustype = BUS_I2C;
>  	priv->idev->evbit[0] = BIT_MASK(EV_KEY);
>  
> -	if (of_property_read_bool(node, "autorepeat"))
> +	if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "autorepeat"))

It would be good to have this driver switched from of_property_*() to
device_property_() API.

>  		__set_bit(EV_REP, priv->idev->evbit);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < cap->num_channels; i++)
> @@ -474,14 +624,8 @@ static int cap11xx_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c_client)
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
>  
> -	irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> -	if (!irq) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "Unable to parse or map IRQ\n");
> -		return -ENXIO;
> -	}
> -
> -	error = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, cap11xx_thread_func,
> -					  IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(dev), priv);
> +	error = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, i2c_client->irq, NULL,
> +					cap11xx_thread_func, IRQF_ONESHOT, dev_name(dev), priv);

I would prefer this change be a separate patch.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry