linux-kernel - Re: x86/csum: Remove unnecessary odd handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh7g131ZG=-HBc-3gMDS8RX-D97A5d3Nx66m9=ZxdXaOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2023 13:02:10 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@...il.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
        edumazet@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86/csum: Remove unnecessary odd handling

On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 at 11:34, Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@...il.com> wrote:
>
> There is a reasonably robust kunit for csum_partial: lib/checksum_kunit.c
> so if you happened to run the kunit testsuite with your patch, it's
> probably correct.

Testing? TESTING?

Why do you think I do open source? I like the programming part. I even
like the debugging part. But testing - that's what users are for. No?

               Linus