[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24b34b27-d2eb-e287-ffbb-29ffde66790d@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 19:58:15 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Robin Jarry <rjarry@...hat.com>, Joe Mario <jmario@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] intel_idle: Add ibrs_off module parameter to force
disable IBRS
Hi,
On 6/27/23 19:25, Waiman Long wrote:
> Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_idle.rst | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_idle.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_idle.rst
> index b799a43da62e..8604e6d1fe2c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_idle.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_idle.rst
You may take or leave these comments as you choose.
> @@ -216,6 +216,21 @@ are ignored).
> The idle states disabled this way can be enabled (on a per-CPU basis) from user
> space via ``sysfs``.
>
> +The ``ibrs_off`` module parameter is a boolean flag (default to false). It is
(default false).
or
(defaults to false).
Then I think it reads better if the next sentence begins with: "If set,"
instead of having it in the middle of the sentence.
> +used to control if IBRS (Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation) should be
> +turned off, if set, when the CPU enters an idle state. This flag will not
> +affect CPUs that are using Enhanced IBRS which can remain on with little
> +performance impact.
> +
> +For some CPUs, IBRS will be selected as mitigation for Spectre v2 and Retbleed
> +security vulnerabilities by default. Leaving the IBRS mode on while idling may
> +have a performance impact on its sibling CPU. The IBRS mode will be turned off
> +by default when the CPU enters into a deep idle state, but not in some
> +shallower ones. Setting the ``ibrs_off`` module parameter will force the IBRS
> +mode to off when the CPU is in any one of the available idle states. This may
> +help performance of a sibling CPU at the expense of a slightly higher wakeup
> +latency for the idle CPU.
thanks.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists