[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJukd/bnkffgsQzT@chao-email>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:09:43 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <x86@...nel.org>, <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, <tony.luck@...el.com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>,
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, <david@...hat.com>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
<ashok.raj@...el.com>, <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
<len.brown@...el.com>, <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
<isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, <ying.huang@...el.com>,
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
<nik.borisov@...e.com>, <bagasdotme@...il.com>, <sagis@...gle.com>,
<imammedo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 05/22] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL infrastructure
>+/*
>+ * Wrapper of __seamcall() to convert SEAMCALL leaf function error code
>+ * to kernel error code. @seamcall_ret and @out contain the SEAMCALL
>+ * leaf function return code and the additional output respectively if
>+ * not NULL.
>+ */
>+static int __always_unused seamcall(u64 fn, u64 rcx, u64 rdx, u64 r8, u64 r9,
>+ u64 *seamcall_ret,
>+ struct tdx_module_output *out)
>+{
>+ u64 sret;
>+ int cpu;
>+
>+ /* Need a stable CPU id for printing error message */
>+ cpu = get_cpu();
>+ sret = __seamcall(fn, rcx, rdx, r8, r9, out);
>+ put_cpu();
>+
>+ /* Save SEAMCALL return code if the caller wants it */
>+ if (seamcall_ret)
>+ *seamcall_ret = sret;
Hi Kai,
All callers in this series pass NULL for seamcall_ret. I am no sure if
you keep it intentionally.
>+
>+ switch (sret) {
>+ case 0:
>+ /* SEAMCALL was successful */
Nit: if you add
#define TDX_SUCCESS 0
and do
case TDX_SUCCESS:
return 0;
then the code becomes self-explanatory. i.e., you can drop the comment.
>+ return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists