[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa2ef58a-f02b-8c9d-2b62-8587f3b091bc@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 10:19:49 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, irogers@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sandipan.das@....com, ananth.narayan@....com,
santosh.shukla@....com, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf evsel amd: Fix IBS error message
On 27-Jun-23 4:34 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Ravi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 3:40 AM Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com> wrote:
>>
>> AMD IBS can do per-process profiling[1] and is no longer restricted to
>> per-cpu or systemwide only. Remove stale error message. Also, checking
>> just exclude_kernel is not sufficient since IBS does not support any
>> privilege filters. So include all exclude_* checks. And finally, move
>> these checks under tools/perf/arch/x86/ from generic code.
>>
>> Before:
>> $ sudo ./perf record -e ibs_op//k -C 0
>> Error:
>> AMD IBS may only be available in system-wide/per-cpu mode. Try
>> using -a, or -C and workload affinity
>>
>> After:
>> $ sudo ./perf record -e ibs_op//k -C 0
>> Error:
>> AMD IBS doesn't support privilege filtering. Try again with
>> exclude_{kernel|user|hv|idle|host|guest}=0.
>
> Can we have more user-friendly messages like below?
>
> "Try again without the privilege modifiers like 'k' at the end."
Sure.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
>> ---
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230621062359.201-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com
>> v1->v2:
>> - Check all exclude_* flags not just exclude_kernel
>> - Move AMD specific checks under tools/perf/arch/x86/
>>
>> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evsel.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 30 +++++++++---------------------
>> tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evsel.c
>> index 512c2d885d24..9a7141c5a4ea 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evsel.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/evsel.c
>> @@ -102,3 +102,28 @@ void arch__post_evsel_config(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_event_attr *attr)
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> +int arch_evsel__open_strerror(struct evsel *evsel, char *msg, size_t size)
>> +{
>> + if (!x86__is_amd_cpu())
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (!evsel->core.attr.precise_ip &&
>> + !(evsel->pmu_name && !strncmp(evsel->pmu_name, "ibs", 3)))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /* More verbose IBS errors. */
>> + if (evsel->core.attr.exclude_kernel || evsel->core.attr.exclude_user ||
>> + evsel->core.attr.exclude_hv || evsel->core.attr.exclude_idle ||
>> + evsel->core.attr.exclude_host || evsel->core.attr.exclude_guest) {
>> + return scnprintf(msg, size, "AMD IBS doesn't support privilege filtering. Try "
>> + "again with exclude_{kernel|user|hv|idle|host|guest}=0.");
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!evsel->core.attr.sample_period) {
>> + return scnprintf(msg, size, "AMD IBS doesn't support counting mode. Try "
>> + "again with sample_{period|freq} with non-zero value.");
>
> Is this for perf stat? We don't allow zero period for perf record.
>
> $ perf record -F 0 true
> frequency and count are zero, aborting
>
> Then maybe it can say: "IBS doesn't support perf stat, Use perf record."
Ok. Let me skip this since generic code is already covering it.
Thanks,
Ravi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists