[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJve8onuBoOOOL4yp3wTTsBMqxf4MZL6uUjgMBjUmWsTO61A2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 14:00:57 +0800
From: Haibo Xu <xiaobo55x@...il.com>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>, maz@...nel.org,
oliver.upton@...ux.dev, seanjc@...gle.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/12] KVM: selftests: Only do get/set tests on present
blessed list
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 5:11 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 06:40:11PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > Only do the get/set tests on present and blessed registers
> > since we don't know the capabilities of any new ones.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> > index b956ee410996..3beb6b62de0a 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
> > @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ extern int vcpu_configs_n;
> > for_each_reg_filtered(i) \
> > if (!find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i]))
> >
> > +#define for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) \
> > + for ((i) = 0; (i) < blessed_n; ++(i)) \
> > + if (find_reg(reg_list->reg, reg_list->n, blessed_reg[i]))
> > +
> > static const char *config_name(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> > {
> > struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
> > @@ -189,6 +193,16 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > + for_each_sublist(c, s)
> > + blessed_n += s->regs_n;
> > + blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
> > +
> > + n = 0;
> > + for_each_sublist(c, s) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
> > + blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
> > + }
> > +
> > /*
> > * We only test that we can get the register and then write back the
> > * same value. Some registers may allow other values to be written
> > @@ -198,8 +212,11 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> > * be written need to have the other values tested, then we should
> > * create a new set of tests for those in a new independent test
> > * executable.
> > + *
> > + * Only do the get/set tests on present, blessed list registers,
> > + * since we don't know the capabilities of any new registers.
> > */
> > - for_each_reg(i) {
> > + for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) {
> > uint8_t addr[2048 / 8];
> > struct kvm_one_reg reg = {
> > .id = reg_list->reg[i],
> > @@ -242,16 +259,6 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - for_each_sublist(c, s)
> > - blessed_n += s->regs_n;
> > - blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
> > -
> > - n = 0;
> > - for_each_sublist(c, s) {
> > - for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
> > - blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
> > - }
> > -
> > for_each_new_reg(i)
> > ++new_regs;
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
>
> Thanks,
> drew
Thanks for the review!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists