linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86/bugs: Break down mitigations configurations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZJv6TL4yH4HbCe/h@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2023 02:15:56 -0700
From:   Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To:     Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, leit@...com,
        "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/bugs: Break down mitigations configurations

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 03:30:40PM -0700, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:36:10AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:41:01PM -0700, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 11:36:53AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > > If I understand where you want to go, you think we should create a
> > > > single patchset that creates a CONFIG_<MITIGATION> for each mitigation,
> > > > and move get it under CONFIG_SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS.
> > > 
> > > Yes, a single series (or a patch) that adds config for each mitigation
> > > would be good.
> > 
> > I've been working on this request, and I may need your help to validate
> > the wordings and dependencies (as in architecture/vendors where the
> > problem needs to be mitigations) for each entry.
> 
> Kconfig text looks fine to me. (Some comments on arch/vendor dependency
> are down below).

Neat, thanks for the clarifications. I will send v3 later today.