lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61ccfd88-1d08-124b-02cc-213107e81438@linux.dev>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2023 09:16:46 +0800
From:   Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     axboe@...nel.dk, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhouchengming@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] blk-mq: fix start_time_ns and alloc_time_ns for
 pre-allocated rq

On 2023/6/28 02:47, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 07:32:42PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
>> Since all requests in batch allocation use the same alloc and start time, so this patch
>> just leave it as it is, and reset it at actual used time.
>>
>> I think both way is ok, do you think it's better to just set the popped one request, leave
>> other requests time to 0 ? If so, I can update to do it.
> 
> I think it'd be clearer if the rule is that the alloc time is set once when
> the request is actually dispensed for use in all cases, so yeah, let's just
> set it once when it actually starts getting used.
> 

Good, I will update the patchset today.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ