| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230329-kunit-devm-inconsistencies-test-v2-1-19feb71e864b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:49:21 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers: base: Add basic devm tests for root
devices
The root devices show some odd behaviours compared to regular "bus" devices
that have been probed through the usual mechanism, so let's create kunit
tests to exercise those paths and odd cases.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
---
drivers/base/test/.kunitconfig | 2 +
drivers/base/test/Kconfig | 4 ++
drivers/base/test/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/base/test/root-device-test.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/test/.kunitconfig b/drivers/base/test/.kunitconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..473923f0998b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/base/test/.kunitconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+CONFIG_KUNIT=y
+CONFIG_DM_KUNIT_TEST=y
diff --git a/drivers/base/test/Kconfig b/drivers/base/test/Kconfig
index 610a1ba7a467..9d42051f8f8e 100644
--- a/drivers/base/test/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/base/test/Kconfig
@@ -9,6 +9,10 @@ config TEST_ASYNC_DRIVER_PROBE
If unsure say N.
+config DM_KUNIT_TEST
+ tristate "KUnit Tests for the device model" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ depends on KUNIT
+
config DRIVER_PE_KUNIT_TEST
bool "KUnit Tests for property entry API" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
depends on KUNIT=y
diff --git a/drivers/base/test/Makefile b/drivers/base/test/Makefile
index 7f76fee6f989..d589ca3fa8fc 100644
--- a/drivers/base/test/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/base/test/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
obj-$(CONFIG_TEST_ASYNC_DRIVER_PROBE) += test_async_driver_probe.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_DM_KUNIT_TEST) += root-device-test.o
+
obj-$(CONFIG_DRIVER_PE_KUNIT_TEST) += property-entry-test.o
CFLAGS_property-entry-test.o += $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN)
diff --git a/drivers/base/test/root-device-test.c b/drivers/base/test/root-device-test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9a3e6cccae13
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/base/test/root-device-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+// Copyright 2023 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
+
+#include <kunit/resource.h>
+
+#include <linux/device.h>
+
+#define DEVICE_NAME "test"
+
+struct test_priv {
+ bool probe_done;
+ bool release_done;
+ wait_queue_head_t release_wq;
+ struct device *dev;
+};
+
+static int root_device_devm_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct test_priv *priv;
+
+ priv = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, priv);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&priv->release_wq);
+
+ test->priv = priv;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void devm_device_action(void *ptr)
+{
+ struct test_priv *priv = ptr;
+
+ priv->release_done = true;
+ wake_up_interruptible(&priv->release_wq);
+}
+
+#define RELEASE_TIMEOUT_MS 100
+
+/*
+ * Tests that a bus-less, non-probed device will run its device-managed
+ * actions when unregistered.
+ */
+static void root_device_devm_register_unregister_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+ int ret;
+
+ priv->dev = root_device_register(DEVICE_NAME);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, priv->dev);
+
+ ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(priv->dev, devm_device_action, priv);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ root_device_unregister(priv->dev);
+
+ ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(priv->release_wq, priv->release_done,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(RELEASE_TIMEOUT_MS));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_GT(test, ret, 0);
+}
+
+static void devm_put_device_action(void *ptr)
+{
+ struct test_priv *priv = ptr;
+
+ put_device(priv->dev);
+ priv->release_done = true;
+ wake_up_interruptible(&priv->release_wq);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Tests that a bus-less, non-probed device will run its device-managed
+ * actions when unregistered, even if someone still holds a reference to
+ * it.
+ */
+static void root_device_devm_register_get_unregister_with_devm_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+ int ret;
+
+ kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core.");
+
+ priv->dev = root_device_register(DEVICE_NAME);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, priv->dev);
+
+ get_device(priv->dev);
+
+ ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(priv->dev, devm_put_device_action, priv);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ root_device_unregister(priv->dev);
+
+ ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(priv->release_wq, priv->release_done,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(RELEASE_TIMEOUT_MS));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_GT(test, ret, 0);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case root_device_devm_tests[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(root_device_devm_register_unregister_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE(root_device_devm_register_get_unregister_with_devm_test),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite root_device_devm_test_suite = {
+ .name = "root-device-devm",
+ .init = root_device_devm_init,
+ .test_cases = root_device_devm_tests,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(root_device_devm_test_suite);
--
2.40.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists