[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230628-unfeeling-tavern-edd4f58396fa@wendy>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 12:10:11 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...osinc.com>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng" <i@...ithal.me>, <linux@...osinc.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu>,
Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
Jiatai He <jiatai2021@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] RISC-V: add Bitmanip/Scalar Crypto parsing from DT
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:01:11PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 07:48:15PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:14:30AM -0700, Evan Green wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 7:38 AM Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...osinc.com> wrote:
> > > It would be nice to consolidate the ones together that search for a
> > > single string and set multiple bits, though I don't have any super
> > > elegant ideas for how off the top of my head.
> >
> > I've got a refactor of this code in progress, dropping all of these
> > copy-paste in place of a loop. It certainly looks more elegant than
> > this, but it will fall over a bit for these "one string matches many
> > extensions" cases. See here:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/patch/20230626-thieving-jockstrap-d35d20b535c5@wendy/
> > My immediate thought is to add another element to riscv_isa_ext_data,
> > that contains "parent" extensions to check for. Should be fairly doable,
> > I'll whip something up on top of that...
>
> Nice, and thanks for the review.
> Should I wait for your refactor to be merged before pushing this one?
I don't know. I think that you should continue on with your series here,
and whichever goes in second gets rebased on top of the other.
I don't think it makes material difference to review of this patchset as
to whether you rebase on top of what I'm working on, so I wouldn't
bother until it gets merged.
Rather hacky, had less time than expected this morning:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/conor/linux.git/commit/?h=riscv-extensions-strings-supersets
Clearly there's issues with looping to RISCV_ISA_MAX_SUPERSETS & I just
repurposed Zicsr for the sake of testing something in the time I had.
Evan, at a high level, does that look more elegant to you, or have I made
things worse?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists