[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230628015752.102267-2-linan666@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 09:57:50 +0800
From: linan666@...weicloud.com
To: song@...nel.org, guoqing.jiang@...ud.ionos.com, colyli@...e.de,
xni@...hat.com
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linan122@...wei.com, yukuai3@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
houtao1@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] md/raid10: check replacement and rdev to prevent submit the same io twice
From: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
After commit 4ca40c2ce099 ("md/raid10: Allow replacement device to be
replace old drive."), 'rdev' and 'replacement' could appear to be
identical. There are already checks for that in wait_blocked_dev() and
raid10_write_request(). Add check for raid10_handle_discard() now.
Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
---
drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
index fabc340aae4f..3e6a09aaaba6 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -1811,6 +1811,8 @@ static int raid10_handle_discard(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio)
r10_bio->devs[disk].bio = NULL;
r10_bio->devs[disk].repl_bio = NULL;
+ if (rdev == rrdev)
+ rrdev = NULL;
if (rdev && (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags)))
rdev = NULL;
if (rrdev && (test_bit(Faulty, &rrdev->flags)))
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists