[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230628132155.1560425-1-libaokun1@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 21:21:48 +0800
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To: <jack@...e.cz>
CC: <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
<yangerkun@...wei.com>, <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>,
<yukuai3@...wei.com>, <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/7] quota: fix race condition between dqput() and dquot_mark_dquot_dirty()
Hello Honza,
This is a solution that uses dquot_srcu to avoid race condition between
dqput() and dquot_mark_dquot_dirty(). I performed a 24+h fault injection
stress test (6 VMs, 4 test threads per VM) and have not found any problems.
And I tested the performance based on the latest mainline (6aeadf7896bf),
the patch set did not lead to performance degradation, and even a little
bit of improvement.
V1->V2:
Modify the solution to use dquot_srcu.
Baokun Li (7):
quota: factor out dquot_write_dquot()
quota: add new global dquot list releasing_dquots
quota: rename dquot_active() to inode_dquot_active()
quota: add new helper dquot_active()
quota: fix dqput() to follow the guarantees dquot_srcu should provide
quota: simplify drop_dquot_ref()
quota: remove unused function put_dquot_list()
fs/quota/dquot.c | 237 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 134 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists