[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJxVHf2YZ1LxPx23@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 12:43:25 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, will@...nel.org,
joro@...tes.org, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
yangyicong@...ilicon.com, jean-philippe@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allow default substream bypass
with a pasid support
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 04:39:48PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > I'd try keeping most of the parts intact while adding a pointer
> > to a structure holding pagetable stuff, to make it cleaner. Then
> > the S1DSS bypass case can be flagged by an empty pointer.
>
> I'd expect that what you need for this is much the same as what Michael has
> already proposed for the PASID-generalisation series. The current inside-out
> notion of S1 domains owning CD tables is what's getting in the way of doing
> the right thing cleanly, in both cases.
Yeah, that was sort of my guessed feeling as well..
What do you think of Michael's series?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists