| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpHjJedDdWVVh_mQZQrubKiQC=wTZS-QC8BeGJutnkKCiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 09:01:40 -0700
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, willy@...radead.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
mhocko@...e.com, josef@...icpanda.com, jack@...e.cz,
ldufour@...ux.ibm.com, laurent.dufour@...ibm.com,
michel@...pinasse.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com, jglisse@...gle.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, minchan@...gle.com, dave@...olabs.net,
punit.agrawal@...edance.com, lstoakes@...il.com, hdanton@...a.com,
apopple@...dia.com, ying.huang@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
yuzhao@...gle.com, dhowells@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
pasha.tatashin@...een.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] mm: handle swap page faults under per-VMA lock
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 6:43 AM Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:17:59AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > When page fault is handled under per-VMA lock protection, all swap page
> > faults are retried with mmap_lock because folio_lock_or_retry has to drop
> > and reacquire mmap_lock if folio could not be immediately locked.
> > Follow the same pattern as mmap_lock to drop per-VMA lock when waiting
> > for folio and retrying once folio is available.
> > With this obstacle removed, enable do_swap_page to operate under
> > per-VMA lock protection. Drivers implementing ops->migrate_to_ram might
> > still rely on mmap_lock, therefore we have to fall back to mmap_lock in
> > that particular case.
> > Note that the only time do_swap_page calls synchronous swap_readpage
> > is when SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO is set, which is only set for
> > QUEUE_FLAG_SYNCHRONOUS devices: brd, zram and nvdimms (both btt and
> > pmem). Therefore we don't sleep in this path, and there's no need to
> > drop the mmap or per-VMA lock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
>
> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
>
> One nit below:
>
> > ---
> > mm/filemap.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> > mm/memory.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> > index 52bcf12dcdbf..7ee078e1a0d2 100644
> > --- a/mm/filemap.c
> > +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> > @@ -1699,31 +1699,38 @@ static int __folio_lock_async(struct folio *folio, struct wait_page_queue *wait)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static void release_fault_lock(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > +{
> > + if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK)
> > + vma_end_read(vmf->vma);
> > + else
> > + mmap_read_unlock(vmf->vma->vm_mm);
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Return values:
> > * 0 - folio is locked.
> > * VM_FAULT_RETRY - folio is not locked.
> > - * mmap_lock has been released (mmap_read_unlock(), unless flags had both
> > - * FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY and FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT set, in
> > - * which case mmap_lock is still held.
> > + * mmap_lock or per-VMA lock has been released (mmap_read_unlock() or
> > + * vma_end_read()), unless flags had both FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY and
> > + * FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT set, in which case the lock is still held.
> > *
> > * If neither ALLOW_RETRY nor KILLABLE are set, will always return 0
> > - * with the folio locked and the mmap_lock unperturbed.
> > + * with the folio locked and the mmap_lock/per-VMA lock is left unperturbed.
> > */
> > vm_fault_t __folio_lock_or_retry(struct folio *folio, struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > {
> > - struct mm_struct *mm = vmf->vma->vm_mm;
> > unsigned int flags = vmf->flags;
> >
> > if (fault_flag_allow_retry_first(flags)) {
> > /*
> > - * CAUTION! In this case, mmap_lock is not released
> > - * even though return VM_FAULT_RETRY.
> > + * CAUTION! In this case, mmap_lock/per-VMA lock is not
> > + * released even though returning VM_FAULT_RETRY.
> > */
> > if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT)
> > return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
> >
> > - mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > + release_fault_lock(vmf);
> > if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE)
> > folio_wait_locked_killable(folio);
> > else
> > @@ -1735,7 +1742,7 @@ vm_fault_t __folio_lock_or_retry(struct folio *folio, struct vm_fault *vmf)
> >
> > ret = __folio_lock_killable(folio);
> > if (ret) {
> > - mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > + release_fault_lock(vmf);
> > return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
> > }
> > } else {
> > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> > index 345080052003..76c7907e7286 100644
> > --- a/mm/memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > @@ -3712,12 +3712,6 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > if (!pte_unmap_same(vmf))
> > goto out;
> >
> > - if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK) {
> > - ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY;
> > - vma_end_read(vma);
> > - goto out;
> > - }
> > -
> > entry = pte_to_swp_entry(vmf->orig_pte);
> > if (unlikely(non_swap_entry(entry))) {
> > if (is_migration_entry(entry)) {
> > @@ -3727,6 +3721,16 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > vmf->page = pfn_swap_entry_to_page(entry);
> > ret = remove_device_exclusive_entry(vmf);
> > } else if (is_device_private_entry(entry)) {
> > + if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_VMA_LOCK) {
> > + /*
> > + * migrate_to_ram is not yet ready to operate
> > + * under VMA lock.
> > + */
> > + vma_end_read(vma);
> > + ret |= VM_FAULT_RETRY;
>
> Here IIUC ret==0 is guaranteed, so maybe "ret = VM_FAULT_RETRY" is slightly
> clearer.
Ack.
>
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > vmf->page = pfn_swap_entry_to_page(entry);
> > vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
> > vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
> > --
> > 2.41.0.162.gfafddb0af9-goog
> >
>
> --
> Peter Xu
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@...roid.com.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists