linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: at91: constify at91_twi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230629223825.27q75s2a3eyiapgy@intel.intel>
Date:   Fri, 30 Jun 2023 00:38:25 +0200
From:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To:     Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Cc:     Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: at91: constify at91_twi_pdata

Hi Michal,

[...]

> -static struct at91_twi_pdata *at91_twi_get_driver_data(
> +static const struct at91_twi_pdata *at91_twi_get_driver_data(
>  					struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
> @@ -189,9 +189,9 @@ static struct at91_twi_pdata *at91_twi_get_driver_data(
>  		match = of_match_node(atmel_twi_dt_ids, pdev->dev.of_node);
>  		if (!match)
>  			return NULL;
> -		return (struct at91_twi_pdata *)match->data;
> +		return match->data;
>  	}
> -	return (struct at91_twi_pdata *) platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
> +	return (const void *) platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;

the const's always confuse me... do you get an error here? Is
this cast really needed?

Andi