[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJ0xhCenJr+Dzs/8@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 00:23:48 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Arne Welzel <arne.welzel@...elight.com>,
Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] hardening updates for v6.5-rc1
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 09:29:42AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > will be completely misued before we have a compiler actually supporting
> > available widely enough that we have it in the usual test bots.
>
> How do you see it being misused? Your mention of the test bots, I think,
> means you're worried the annotations will go unchecked for valid syntax?
Exactly.
> FWIW, I've got builders with the GCC and Clang patches that should catch
> this.
Are we going to get them wired up for automatic checks somewhere?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists