linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 7/8] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Update PCI ID list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2023 10:19:06 +0200
From:   Amadeusz Sławiński 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/8] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Update PCI ID list

On 6/28/2023 4:52 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:51:34PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
>> Use PCI device IDs from pci_ids.h header and while at it change to using
>> PCI_DEVICE_DATA macro, to simplify declarations.
> 
> PCI_DEVICE_DATA()
> 
> ...
> 
>> +	{ PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_SKL_LP,	&snd_soc_acpi_intel_skl_machines) },
> 
> Do you really need TAB(s) in the parameter list?
> 

I did this to align entries, I know it is not that visible in this 
patch, but they are defined close to each other and I feel that it looks 
better if they are aligned, but can drop alignment if you prefer. Should 
I also drop them in other patches, as I don't see comment for that?