[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4fowzgkh7yo5ku2fsrptyi7jzikynjtq4zpfcx7k26vk4k6zj3@ubnupp5jqgle>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:26:31 +0200
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpuset: Allow setscheduler regardless of manipulated
task
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 08:11:33AM -0400, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
> So I think you should just use
> cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(cpuset_cgrp_subsys) as the v2 check if your focus
> is just to prevent problem when enabling cpuset controller.
I thought the bare cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(cpuset_cgrp_subsys) is not used
in cpuset.c but I was wrong -- yes, I'll change this.
> This change will likely conflict with the latest cpuset change on tracking #
> of dl tasks in a cpuset. You will have to, at least, move the dl task check
> before the security_task_setscheduler() check.
>
> Another fact about cpuset controller enabling is that both cpus_allowed and
> mems_allowed are empty at that point. You may also add these checks as a
> preconditions for disabling the security_task_setscheduler check.
Ah, I will rebase on fresh mainline (or do you mean another reference?).
Thanks for the hints,
Michal
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists