[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3de124c-6aa8-e930-e238-7bd6dd7929a6@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 15:01:13 +0200
From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] arch/x86: Declare edid_info in <asm/screen_info.h>
Hi
Am 29.06.23 um 14:35 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023, at 13:45, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> The global variable edid_info contains the firmware's EDID information
>> as an extension to the regular screen_info on x86. Therefore move it to
>> <asm/screen_info.h>.
>>
>> Add the Kconfig token ARCH_HAS_EDID_INFO to guard against access on
>> architectures that don't provide edid_info. Select it on x86.
>
> I'm not sure we need another symbol in addition to
> CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID. Since all the code behind that
> existing symbol is also x86 specific, would it be enough
> to just add either 'depends on X86' or 'depends on X86 ||
> COMPILE_TEST' there?
FIRMWARE_EDID is a user-selectable feature, while ARCH_HAS_EDID_INFO
announces an architecture feature. They do different things.
Right now, ARCH_HAS_EDID_INFO only works on the old BIOS-based VESA
systems. In the future, I want to add support for EDID data from EFI and
OF as well. It would be stored in edid_info. I assume that the new
symbol will become useful then.
Before this patchset, I originally wanted to make use of edid_info in
the simpledrm graphics driver. But I found that the rsp code could use
some work first. Maybe the patchset are already tailored towards the
future changes.
Best regards
Thomas
>
> Arnd
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (841 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists