linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230629141719.4pwvpd4q5fow6zwu@moria.home.lan>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2023 10:17:19 -0400
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To:     Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bcachefs

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 01:18:11PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> There seems to be a wild misconception here which frankly is very
> concering. Afaik, it is absolutely not the case that an fput() from an
> exiting task ends up in delayed_work(). But I'm happy to be convinced
> otherwise.

I already explained the real issue - it's fput() from an AIO completion,
because that has no association with task it was done on behalf of.