[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29968249-3fce-d53f-4515-1c7b815cd4b4@tessares.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:00:42 +0200
From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: fix unused proc_cap_handler() function warning
Hi Arnd,
On 07/06/2023 14:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Since usermodehelper_table() is marked static now, we get a
> warning about it being unused when SYSCTL is disabled:
>
> kernel/umh.c:497:12: error: 'proc_cap_handler' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
Thank you for the patch!
We also hit the same issue on our side after today's sync with Linus'
tree. I confirm this patch fixes the issue.
Tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
I didn't see this patch applied in Luis' sysctl-next branch, do you know
who is taking care of it?
> Just move it inside of the same #ifdef.
>
> Fixes: e6944e3b75df7 ("sysctl: move umh sysctl registration to its own file")
A small detail: it looks like the SHA has been modified, it should be
861dc0b46432 instead of e6944e3b75df7:
Fixes: 861dc0b46432 ("sysctl: move umh sysctl registration to its own file")
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists