[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a0c8d74a-dcfe-78a7-74bd-4447ed6944dc@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 08:15:52 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Matteo Rizzo <matteorizzo@...gle.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jordyzomer@...gle.com, evn@...gle.com, poprdi@...gle.com,
corbet@....net, axboe@...nel.dk, asml.silence@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
ribalda@...omium.org, chenhuacai@...nel.org, steve@....org,
gpiccoli@...lia.com, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com, bhe@...hat.com,
oleksandr@...alenko.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Add a new sysctl to disable io_uring system-wide
On 6/29/23 06:27, Matteo Rizzo wrote:
> +static int __read_mostly sysctl_io_uring_disabled;
Shouldn't this be a static key instead of an int in order to minimize the
performance impact on the io_uring_setup() system call? See also
Documentation/staging/static-keys.rst.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists