[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB60839D1A523095BAF855C8B7FC25A@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 15:56:28 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"Peter Newman" <peternewman@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC: James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 7/7] x86/resctrl: Determine if Sub-NUMA Cluster is
enabled and initialize.
>> +static const struct x86_cpu_id snc_cpu_ids[] __initconst = {
>> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ICELAKE_X, 0),
>> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(SAPPHIRERAPIDS_X, 0),
>> + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(EMERALDRAPIDS_X, 0),
>> + {}
>> +};
>
> Cascade Lake and Skylake also seem to support Sub-NUMA cluster.
> At least in my environment(Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6254 CPU @ 3.10GHz),
> Sub-NUMA cluster is supported.
Shaopeng TAN,
This is true. But MSR_RMID_SNC_CONFIG (0xCA0) is not implemented
for CPUs before ICELAKE.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists