[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bcfdc77d-a94d-bca1-56e3-5e14e91f6fd9@189.cn>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 01:00:10 +0800
From: Sui Jingfeng <15330273260@....cn>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, YiPeng Chai <YiPeng.Chai@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Likun Gao <Likun.Gao@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@....com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Bokun Zhang <Bokun.Zhang@....com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@...dia.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Pan Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian Konig <christian.koenig@....com>,
Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] PCI/VGA: Introduce is_boot_device function
callback to vga_client_register
Hi,
On 2023/6/29 23:54, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 01:08:15PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> A nouveau developer(Lyude) from redhat send me a R-B,
>>
>> Thanks for the developers of nouveau project.
>>
>>
>> Please allow me add a link[1] here.
>>
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0afadc69f99a36bc9d03ecf54ff25859dbc10e28.camel@redhat.com/
> 1) Thanks for this. If you post another version of this series,
> please pick up Lyude's Reviewed-by and include it in the relevant
> patches (as long as you haven't made significant changes to the
> code Lyude reviewed).
Yes, no significant changes. Just fix typo.
I also would like to add support for other DRM drivers.
But I think this deserve another patch.
> Whoever applies this should automatically
> pick up Reviewed-by/Ack/etc that are replies to the version being
> applied, but they won't go through previous revisions to find them.
>
> 2) Please mention the commit to which the series applies. I tried to
> apply this on v6.4-rc1, but it doesn't apply cleanly.
Since I'm a graphic driver developer, I'm using drm-tip.
I just have already pulled, it still apply cleanly on drm-tip.
> 3) Thanks for including cover letters in your postings. Please
> include a little changelog in the cover letter so we know what
> changed between v6 and v7, etc.
No change between v6 and v7,
it seems that it is because the mailbox don't allow me to sending too
many mails a day.
so some of the patch is failed to delivery because out of quota.
> 4) Right now we're in the middle of the v6.5 merge window, so new
> content, e.g., this series, is too late for v6.5. Most
> maintainers, including me, wait to merge new content until the
> merge window closes and a new -rc1 is tagged. This merge window
> should close on July 9, and people will start merging content for
> v6.6, typically based on v6.5-rc1.
I'm wondering
Would you will merge all of the patches in this series (e.g. including
the patch for drm/amdgpu(7/8) and drm/radeon(8/8)) ?
Or just part of them?
Emm, I don't know because my patch seems across different subsystem of
Linux kernel.
There is also a developer for AMDGPU (Mario) give me a R-B for the
patch-0002 of this series.
So, at least, PATCH-0001, PATCH-0002, PATCH-0003, PATCH-0004, PATCH-0006
are already OK(got reviewed by).
Those 5 patch are already qualified to be merged, I think.
I means that if you could merge those 5 patch first, then there no need
to send another version again.
I will refine the rest patch with more details and description.
I'm fear of making too much noise.
> Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists