[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZJ3BjFExLBWXZxqm@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:38:20 +0000
From: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
To: Utkarsh Patel <utkarsh.h.patel@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, bleung@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Configure Retimer
cable type
Hi Utkarsh,
Thanks for sending the patch.
On Jun 28 10:37, Utkarsh Patel wrote:
> Connector class driver only configure cable type active or passive.
> With this change it will also configure if the cable type is retimer or
nit: Please use imperative form ("Configure if the cable type is...")
> redriver if required by AP. This detail will be provided as a part of
> cable discover mode VDO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Patel <utkarsh.h.patel@...el.com>
>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Implemented use of cable discover mode vdo.
> - Removed adittional changes to host command.
> ---
>
> ---
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> index 25f9767c28e8..557f396d1c00 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_typec.c
> @@ -406,6 +406,25 @@ static int cros_typec_usb_safe_state(struct cros_typec_port *port)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int cros_typec_get_cable_vdo(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num,
> + uint16_t svid)
u16 type is used in the kernel.
Also, if this function returns a VDO, the return type should be u32, but... (see later)
> +{
> + struct cros_typec_port *port = typec->ports[port_num];
Pass the struct cros_typec_port directly (and then drop the port_num argument).
> + struct list_head *head = &port->plug_mode_list;
> + struct cros_typec_altmode_node *node;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(node, head, list) {
> + if (node->amode->svid == svid)
> + break;
Return the vdo here directly; that way, if you reach past the list iteration,
we know for sure the SVID wasn't found and you can unconditionally return the error
case.
> + }
> +
> + if (node->amode->svid != svid)
> + return 0;
I think it is more correct here to have an int return type (so the "not found" case can
return -1 or the right error code), and then have the cable VDO as a pointer argument.
> +
> + return node->amode->vdo;
> +}
> +
> +
> /*
> * Spoof the VDOs that were likely communicated by the partner for TBT alt
> * mode.
> @@ -416,6 +435,7 @@ static int cros_typec_enable_tbt(struct cros_typec_data *typec,
> {
> struct cros_typec_port *port = typec->ports[port_num];
> struct typec_thunderbolt_data data;
> + uint32_t cable_vdo;
u32.
> int ret;
>
> if (typec->pd_ctrl_ver < 2) {
> @@ -442,6 +462,11 @@ static int cros_typec_enable_tbt(struct cros_typec_data *typec,
>
> data.cable_mode |= TBT_SET_CABLE_ROUNDED(pd_ctrl->cable_gen);
Probably a separate patch, but can we get rid of this too, since the cable_vdo should
have this information?
>
> + cable_vdo = cros_typec_get_cable_vdo(typec, port_num, USB_TYPEC_TBT_SID);
> +
> + if (cable_vdo & TBT_CABLE_RETIMER)
> + data.cable_mode |= TBT_CABLE_RETIMER;
Why just not or the cable_vdo into existing cable_mode"? :
data.cable_mode |= cable_vdo;
> +
> /* Enter Mode VDO */
> data.enter_vdo = TBT_SET_CABLE_SPEED(pd_ctrl->cable_speed);
>
> @@ -513,17 +538,23 @@ static int cros_typec_enable_usb4(struct cros_typec_data *typec,
> {
> struct cros_typec_port *port = typec->ports[port_num];
> struct enter_usb_data data;
> + uint32_t cable_vdo;
u32
>
> data.eudo = EUDO_USB_MODE_USB4 << EUDO_USB_MODE_SHIFT;
>
> + cable_vdo = cros_typec_get_cable_vdo(typec, port_num, USB_TYPEC_TBT_SID);
> +
> /* Cable Speed */
> data.eudo |= pd_ctrl->cable_speed << EUDO_CABLE_SPEED_SHIFT;
>
> /* Cable Type */
> if (pd_ctrl->control_flags & USB_PD_CTRL_OPTICAL_CABLE)
> data.eudo |= EUDO_CABLE_TYPE_OPTICAL << EUDO_CABLE_TYPE_SHIFT;
> - else if (pd_ctrl->control_flags & USB_PD_CTRL_ACTIVE_CABLE)
> + else if (cable_vdo & TBT_CABLE_RETIMER)
> data.eudo |= EUDO_CABLE_TYPE_RE_TIMER << EUDO_CABLE_TYPE_SHIFT;
> + else if (!(cable_vdo & TBT_CABLE_RETIMER) &&
The !(cable_vdo & TBT_CABLE_RETIMER) check shouldn't be necessary; the
earlier "else if" already ensures that by the time we reach here, this
clause is satisfied.
> + (pd_ctrl->control_flags & USB_PD_CTRL_ACTIVE_CABLE))
> + data.eudo |= EUDO_CABLE_TYPE_RE_DRIVER << EUDO_CABLE_TYPE_SHIFT;
>
> data.active_link_training = !!(pd_ctrl->control_flags &
> USB_PD_CTRL_ACTIVE_LINK_UNIDIR);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists