[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c3be94e-56c0-4820-853d-669e90969c24@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 18:42:57 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: johan+linaro@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com,
kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qdsp6: q6apm: use dai link pcm id as pcm device
number
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 06:33:09PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> On 29/06/2023 16:43, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:24:04AM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> > > For some reason we ended up with a setup without this flag.
> > > This resulted in inconsistent sound card devices numbers which
> > > are also not starting as expected at dai_link->id.
> > > (Ex: MultiMedia1 pcm ended up with device number 4 instead of 0)
> > Why is this a problem?
> In existing Qualcomm setup the backend pcm are added first, which results in
> frontend pcms getting pcm numbers after this.
> For example: with 3 backend dailinks in DT we have frontend pcm start at 3.
> Now if we add new backend dai-link in DT we now have frontend pcm start at
> 4.
> This is a bug in qualcomm driver.
Why is this an actual problem rather than just being a bit ugly? What
is the negative consequence of having a PCM with this number?
> > > With this patch patch now the MultiMedia1 PCM ends up with device number 0
> > > as expected.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9b4fe0f1cd79 ("ASoC: qdsp6: audioreach: add q6apm-dai support")
> > > Cc: <Stable@...r.kernel.org>
> >
> > Won't this be an ABI change? That seems like it'd disrupt things in
> > stable.
> Yes, but this is a real bug. without fixing this also results in abi(pcm
> number) change when we add new backend dai-link. I have also sent fix for
> UCM to handle this.
I'm still not clear why you believe this to be a bug.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists