linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] module: add support to avoid duplicates early on load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZJzN6czfRSz2hj7O@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2023 17:18:49 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, song@...nel.org,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
        Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        rafael@...nel.org, lucas.de.marchi@...il.com,
        christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, peterz@...radead.org, rppt@...nel.org,
        dave@...olabs.net, willy@...radead.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
        mhocko@...e.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        colin.i.king@...il.com, jim.cromie@...il.com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, jbaron@...mai.com,
        rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, yujie.liu@...el.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, hch@....de, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pmladek@...e.com, prarit@...hat.com,
        lennart@...ttering.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] module: add support to avoid duplicates early on load

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 04:17:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 at 15:07, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, since I clearly didn't communicate clearly that I was throwing
> > the patch over to you, let me go and find it and just apply it myself.
> 
> Ok, I spent some time writing a better commit message for that change,
> tried to make sure I got everybody's comments and Tested-by's sorted
> out etc, and committed the end result.
> 
> I also did the actual module pull and your sysctl pull.
> 
> Can you please check that it all looks like you expected?

Looks good to me, thanks for doing that. It certainly was not clear
to me that you had expected me to merge your patch just because you
had previously merged your own and later reverted it. But now I know
in the future I may just pick up your patches, instead of expecting
you to shortcut it, thanks!

  Luis