[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875y74elsv.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 22:29:20 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Allow disabling all native fbdev drivers and only
keeping DRM emulation
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 07:38:01PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> writes:
>> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 12:51:02AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> >> This patch series splits the fbdev core support in two different Kconfig
>> >> symbols: FB and FB_CORE. The motivation for this is to allow CONFIG_FB to
>> >> be disabled, while still having the the core fbdev support needed for the
>> >> CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION to be enabled. The motivation is automatically
>> >> disabling all fbdev drivers instead of having to be disabled individually.
>> >>
>> >> The reason for doing this is that now with simpledrm, there's no need for
>> >> the legacy fbdev (e.g: efifb or vesafb) drivers anymore and many distros
>> >
>> > How does simpledrm works with earlycon=efi?
>> >
>>
>> simpledrm isn't for earlycon. For that you use a different driver (i.e:
>> drivers/firmware/efi/earlycon.c). I'm just talking about fbdev drivers
>> here that could be replaced by simpledrm.
>
> So, efifb can't be replaced. Please, fix your cover letter to reduce false
> impression of the scope of usage of the simpledrm.
>
Nothing to fixup.
You are conflating the efifb fbdev driver (drivers/video/fbdev/efifb.c)
with the efifb earlycon driver (drivers/firmware/efi/earlycon.c). I'm
talking about the former (which can be replaced by simpledrm) while you
are talking about the latter.
--
Best regards,
Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists