linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.3 00/29] 6.3.11-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Jun 2023 07:19:03 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.3 00/29] 6.3.11-rc1 review

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 03:54:03PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Early report of failures.
> 
> Arm64 fails with GCC-11 on the following configurations:
> * lkftconfig
> * lkftconfig-64k_page_size
> * lkftconfig-debug
> * lkftconfig-debug-kmemleak
> * lkftconfig-kasan
> * lkftconfig-kselftest
> * lkftconfig-kunit
> * lkftconfig-libgpiod
> * lkftconfig-perf
> * lkftconfig-rcutorture
> 
> lkftconfig is basically defconfig + a few fragments [1]. The suffixes
> mean that we're enabling a few other kconfigs.
> 
> Failure:
> -----8<-----
> /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c: In function 'do_page_fault':
> /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:576:9: error: 'vma' undeclared
> (first use in this function); did you mean 'vmap'?
>   576 |         vma = lock_mm_and_find_vma(mm, addr, regs);
>       |         ^~~
>       |         vmap
> /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:576:9: note: each undeclared
> identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:579:17: error: label 'done' used
> but not defined
>   579 |                 goto done;
>       |                 ^~~~
> make[4]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:252:
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.o] Error 1
> make[4]: Target 'arch/arm64/mm/' not remade because of errors.
> ----->8-----

Is this also failing in Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h