linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/30] 6.1.37-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023063058-enchanted-narrow-eb7d@gregkh>
Date:   Fri, 30 Jun 2023 07:30:18 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/30] 6.1.37-rc1 review

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:21:39PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 23:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 04:25:40PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 12:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.37 release.
> > > > There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 01 Jul 2023 18:41:39 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.37-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > >
> > > Early report of failures.
> > >
> > > SPARC and PA-RISC both fail to build (GCC-8 and GCC-11).
> > >
> > > For SPARC:
> > > * allnoconfig
> > > * defconfig
> > > * tinyconfig
> > >
> > > -----8<-----
> > > /builds/linux/arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c: In function 'force_user_fault':
> > > /builds/linux/arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c:312:49: error: 'regs'
> > > undeclared (first use in this function)
> > >   312 |         vma = lock_mm_and_find_vma(mm, address, regs);
> > >       |                                                 ^~~~
> > > /builds/linux/arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.c:312:49: note: each undeclared
> > > identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > > make[4]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:250:
> > > arch/sparc/mm/fault_32.o] Error 1
> > > make[4]: Target 'arch/sparc/mm/' not remade because of errors.
> > > ----->8-----
> > >
> > > For PA-RISC:
> > > * allnoconfig
> > > * tinyconfig
> > >
> > > -----8<-----
> > > /builds/linux/arch/parisc/mm/fault.c: In function 'do_page_fault':
> > > /builds/linux/arch/parisc/mm/fault.c:292:22: error: 'prev' undeclared
> > > (first use in this function)
> > >   292 |                 if (!prev || !(prev->vm_flags & VM_GROWSUP))
> > >       |                      ^~~~
> > > /builds/linux/arch/parisc/mm/fault.c:292:22: note: each undeclared
> > > identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > > make[4]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:250:
> > > arch/parisc/mm/fault.o] Error 1
> > > make[4]: Target 'arch/parisc/mm/' not remade because of errors.
> > > ----->8-----
> >
> > These issues are also in Linus's tree right now, right?  Or are they
> > unique to the -rc releases right now?
> 
> Correct. I went to look at mainline and it fails the same way there
> for SPARC and PA-RISC, so 6.1 and 6.4 are on par there; 6.3's failures
> on Arm64 are only seen there.

Thanks, I'll go dig into the 6.3 failures after coffee...