linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 07/10] acpi/nfit: Move acpi_nfit_notify() before acpi_nfit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aad9608b-34fa-1405-1fc4-5eb8d7d1647f@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Jun 2023 11:48:27 +0200
From:   "Wilczynski, Michal" <michal.wilczynski@...el.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
        <dave.jiang@...el.com>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        <rui.zhang@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/10] acpi/nfit: Move acpi_nfit_notify() before
 acpi_nfit_add()



On 6/29/2023 6:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:51 PM Michal Wilczynski
> <michal.wilczynski@...el.com> wrote:
>> To use new style of installing event handlers acpi_nfit_notify() needs
>> to be known inside acpi_nfit_add(). Move acpi_nfit_notify() upwards in
>> the file, so it can be used inside acpi_nfit_add().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@...el.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 14 +++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
>> index 07204d482968..aff79cbc2190 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
>> @@ -3312,6 +3312,13 @@ void acpi_nfit_shutdown(void *data)
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_nfit_shutdown);
>>
>> +static void acpi_nfit_notify(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 event)
>> +{
>> +       device_lock(&adev->dev);
>> +       __acpi_nfit_notify(&adev->dev, adev->handle, event);
>> +       device_unlock(&adev->dev);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int acpi_nfit_add(struct acpi_device *adev)
>>  {
>>         struct acpi_buffer buf = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
>> @@ -3446,13 +3453,6 @@ void __acpi_nfit_notify(struct device *dev, acpi_handle handle, u32 event)
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__acpi_nfit_notify);
>>
>> -static void acpi_nfit_notify(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 event)
>> -{
>> -       device_lock(&adev->dev);
>> -       __acpi_nfit_notify(&adev->dev, adev->handle, event);
>> -       device_unlock(&adev->dev);
>> -}
>> -
>>  static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_nfit_ids[] = {
>>         { "ACPI0012", 0 },
>>         { "", 0 },
>> --
> Please fold this patch into the next one.  By itself, it is an
> artificial change IMV.

I agree with you, but I got told specifically to do that.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/e0f67199-9feb-432c-f0cb-7bdbdaf9ff63@linux.intel.com/