[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ca04dbe-572a-0f22-ad5f-c93d95f51cf6@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 12:23:25 +0200
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
To: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Simon Arlott <simon@...iron.net>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq-bcm6345-l1: do not assume a fixed block to cpu
mapping
On 29/6/23 09:26, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> The irq to block mapping is fixed, and interrupts from the first block
> will always be routed to the first parent IRQ. But the parent interrupts
> themselves can be routed to any available CPU.
>
> This is used by the bootloader to map the first parent interrupt to the
> boot CPU, regardless wether the boot CPU is the first one or the second
> one.
>
> When booting from the second CPU, the assumption that the first block's
> IRQ is mapped to the first CPU breaks, and the system hangs because
> interrupts do not get routed correctly.
>
> Fix this by passing the appropriate bcm6434_l1_cpu to the interrupt
> handler instead of the chip itself, so the handler always has the right
> block.
>
> Fixes: c7c42ec2baa1 ("irqchips/bmips: Add bcm6345-l1 interrupt controller")
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists