linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/proc: Do not build x86-64 tests on non-x86-64 builds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 30 Jun 2023 12:27:44 +0200
From:   Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
To:     Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/proc: Do not build x86-64 tests on
 non-x86-64 builds

Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 06:23:00PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
>> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>
>> 
>> The proc-empty-vm test is x86-64 only. Remove that test from
>> non-x86-64 builds.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>
>
> What's the address space size on risc-v?

Different sizes are supported, 39b, 48b, and 57b:
Documentation/riscv/vm-layout.rst

Did you have anything particular in mind?